Friday, April 3, 2015

Are we responsible for what we say online?


               With the way social media is set up today people are able to express themselves and post their opinions in numerous places.  But with this freedom are people responsible for what they say?  There are a growing number of libel cases relating to internet and social media.  How are people using these social media outlets and are they abusing these open forums of communication?  There are two types of defamation; libel and slander.  Libel is written defamation and slander is spoken or verbal defamation.  Like we discussed in class social media is not private what so ever.  We are 100% responsible for what we say online or in social media networks.  What constitutes online defamation is the publication of false statements that can injure someone’s reputation.  Though, if the statement is true then the posting/comment cannot be deemed as libel.  For example if a customer reviews a restaurant and says “don’t go here because there is a cockroach infestation”.  If this is true then it is not libel.  In class we also discussed examples of teachers on Facebook getting fired over pictures they uploaded, employees getting fired over complaints about the job, and students getting suspended from school for comments they made about teachers or the principal.  Just because we cannot see the person or group we are talking to doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences to what we say.  In this past year Penn State has had two major incidents with online defamation in which both incidents have resulted in the police getting involved. The first example, was a comment on yik yak.  Yik yak is basically the same concept as Twitter but anonymous.  But as we learned in the fall semester it is not quite anonymous.  A user on yik yak posted a yak threatening to shoot up the Hub.  Other users on the application reported the yak to the police and the police tracked the comment to the users and phone who was later caught and arrested.  In this case the comment was libel because they specifically threatened to harm a group of people and a specific location.  The second example is the KDR private Facebook page with postings of which included nude, inappropriate photos of women posing or unconscious.  The members of this fraternity completely violated the privacy of these women.  As these incidents apply to class, we have to understand that everything we put up on the Internet is not 100% private.  Threatening the lives of people is completely wrong morally and people should be held libel for saying these type of things.  In the other case the women who were exposed on the Internet should be awake up call for other women to be cautious to who they send photos to or don’t ever send them.  We live in a very social technology oriented society and we now need to be very careful of what we post, send, or upload to the Internet, because there is no such thing as privacy on the Internet. 

               Articles-


 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment